þÿ<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta name=Title content="O'HARA, P"> <meta name=Keywords content=""> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode"> <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11"> <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 11"> <link rel=File-List href="34_2_133-140_files/filelist.xml"> <title>O'HARA, P</title> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Author>Gaston</o:Author> <o:Template>Normal</o:Template> <o:LastAuthor>Benjamin Saenz</o:LastAuthor> <o:Revision>2</o:Revision> <o:Created>2007-07-19T19:52:00Z</o:Created> <o:LastSaved>2007-07-19T19:52:00Z</o:LastSaved> <o:Pages>1</o:Pages> <o:Words>304</o:Words> <o:Characters>1735</o:Characters> <o:Company>Environment Canada</o:Company> <o:Lines>14</o:Lines> <o:Paragraphs>3</o:Paragraphs> <o:CharactersWithSpaces>2130</o:CharactersWithSpaces> <o:Version>11.773</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch> <o:TargetScreenSize>800x600</o:TargetScreenSize> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:Compatibility> <w:UseFELayout/> </w:Compatibility> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Times New Roman"; panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;} @font-face {font-family:"MS Mincho"; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-alt:"ÿ-ÿ3 fg"; mso-font-charset:128; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:fixed; mso-font-signature:1 134676480 16 0 131072 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-parent:""; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> </head> <body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US style='tab-interval:.5in'> <div class=Section1> <p class=MsoNormal>O'HARA, P.D. &amp; K.H. MORGAN.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>2006.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Do low rates of oiled carcass recovery in beached bird surveys indicate low rates of ship-source oil spills?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span><i>Marine Ornithology </i><span style='font-style:normal'>34: 133-140.</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal><![if !supportEmptyParas]>&nbsp;<![endif]><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=MsoNormal>Oil pollution is a serious threat to marine ecosystems.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Beached bird surveys, which are networks of volunteers who survey beaches for seabird carcasses, are conducted world-wide.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Data from these surveys have played a major role in determining that chronically occurring small-scale oil pollution can have cumulative ecosystem-level impacts.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Within Canada, Newfoundland has reported high rates of oiled carcasses in beached bird surveys (62%), whereas oiled carcass densities in British Columbia (BC) are low (12%) compared to Newfoundland and other parts of the world.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Here we present a risk model  as an approach to interpreting beached bird survey data. The model incorporates spatio-temporal distributions of seabirds that are considered vulnerable to oil pollution, shipping densities as a proxy for risk of oil spills, and the proximity of both to areas where beached bird surveys are conducted.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Using the model, we identify BC surveys along the west coast of Vancouver Island as most similar to surveys conducted in Newfoundland, and we note that 56% of carcasses reported in those BC surveys were oiled, which is similar to rates found in the Newfoundland surveys.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Finally, we emphasize that wind (speed, direction, and persistence) and the location of beach surveys, relative to seabird distributions and high-traffic shipping lanes, must be considered when interpreting beached bird survey results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Because wind data is archived and publicly available, it can be used in reanalyzing older beached bird data from BC.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Wind data would also be useful for coordinating future survey efforts, leading to better documentation of the oiling rates of birds off the coast of British Columbia.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Finally, our model provides a framework for estimating the risk to seabirds of oiling at sea and for identifying information gaps.<o:p></o:p></p> <p class=MsoNormal><![if !supportEmptyParas]>&nbsp;<![endif]><o:p></o:p></p> <p class=MsoNormal>Key words: shipping, oil pollution, British Columbia, seabirds, beached bird survey, wind</p> <p class=MsoNormal><![if !supportEmptyParas]>&nbsp;<![endif]><o:p></o:p></p> </div> </body> </html>