Menu

Volume 54, No. 2

Search by author or title:

Comparing local and regional density models for marine birds in the Gulf of Maine.


Authors

MEGAN C. FERGUSON1*, EVAN M. ADAMS1, MARY E. MCELROY1, IAIN J. STENHOUSE1, ANDREW T. GILBERT1, ARLISS J. WINSHIP2, & KATHRYN A. WILLIAMS1
1Biodiversity Research Institute, Portland, Maine 04103, United States (*megan.ferguson@briwildlife.org)
2CSS Inc., under contract to NOAA National Centers for Coastal and Ocean Science (NCCOS), Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910, United States

Citation

Ferguson, M. C., Adams, E. M., McElroy, M. E., Stenhouse, I. J., Gilbert, A. T., Winship, A. J., & Williams, K. A. (2026). Comparing local and regional density models for marine birds in the Gulf of Maine. Marine Ornithology, 54(2), 241-258.
http://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.54.2.1703

Received 10 October 2025, accepted 09 March 2026

Date Published: 2026/10/15
Date Online: 2026/09/20

Key words: density models, digital aerial survey, marine birds, offshore wind, risk assessment, spatial cross-correlation, seabird

Abstract

The Gulf of Maine has extensive potential for floating offshore wind energy development. However, to assess potential impacts, substantial spatiotemporal gaps exist in offshore wildlife data from standardized observational surveys in the region. Such data can support distribution and density modeling to inform marine spatial planning. In an effort to reduce these gaps, we modeled seasonal marine bird densities based on data from four digital aerial surveys conducted in 2023-2024 across a 6,700 km2 area of the Gulf. We also compared these local models to existing regional density models for marine birds using spatial cross-correlation and center-of-gravity analyses to assess potential mismatches in predictions. Local and regional models were weakly spatially correlated for most taxon/season combinations (global spatial cross-correlation indices with negative exponential decay ranged from -0.21 to 0.23, mean = 0.07, median = 0.11), and local and regional centers of gravity did not consistently align (mean absolute difference = 11.7 km). We discuss several reasons for discrepancies between local and regional predictions of marine bird densities, including underlying differences in model structure and differences in spatiotemporal resolution of source data. Given the limitations of both models, we were unable to determine which model can best inform offshore planning and risk assessments. Further observational surveys are needed to refine models so they may be used reliably for management and conservation, particularly in winter, which is the least surveyed season in the Gulf. Future observational survey efforts should follow best available guidance for survey design to support effective consideration of marine birds in offshore planning and risk assessments.

References


Anderson, S. C. (2025). sdmTMBextra: Extra functions for working with 'sdmTMB' models (Version 0.0.1) [R package]. https://github.com/pbs-assess/sdmTMBextra

Anderson, S. C., Ward, E. J., English, P. A., Barnett, L. A. K., & Thorson, J. T. (2024). sdmTMB: An R package for fast, flexible, and user-friendly generalized linear mixed effects models with spatial and spatiotemporal random fields. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.24.485545

Avian Displacement Guidance Committee. (2024). Guidance for pre- and post-construction monitoring to detect changes in marine bird distributions and habitat use related to offshore wind development [Report to the Offshore Wind Environmental Technical Working Group]. https://www.nyetwg.com/specialist-committees/avian-displacements

Avian Displacement Guidance Committee. (2023). Recommendations for evaluating the use of existing baseline observational survey data for birds in offshore wind site characterization processes for the U.S. Atlantic [Report to the Offshore Wind Environmental Technical Working Group]. https://www.nyetwg.com/specialist-committees/avian-displacement

Bakka, H., Vanhatalo, J., Illian, J. B., Simpson, D., & Rue, H. (2019). Non-stationary Gaussian models with physical barriers. Spatial Statistics, 29, 268-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2019.01.002

Baran, M. A., Kress, S. W., Shannon, P., Lyons, D. E., Major, H. L., & Diamond, A. W. (2022). Overwinter movement of Atlantic Puffins (Fratercula arctica) breeding in the Gulf of Maine: Inter- and intra-colony effects. Waterbirds, 45(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.045.0103

Bureau of Ocean Management. (2020). Guidelines for providing avian survey information for renewable energy development on the Outer Continental Shelf pursuant to 30 CFR Part 585. https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/survey-guidelines-renewable-energy-development

Bureau of Ocean Management. (2024). New York Bight Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PEIS) (BOEM 2024-054). Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling Virginia, USA. https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/new-york-bight-final-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement

Boyd, C., Punt, A. E., Weimerskirch, H., & Bertrand, S. (2014). Movement models provide insights into variation in the foraging effort of central place foragers. Ecological Modelling, 286, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.015

Braun, C. D., Ochoa-Lezama, N., Farchadi, N., Arostegui, M. C., Alexander, M., Allyn, A., Bograd, S. J., Brodie, A., Crear, D. P., Curtis, T. H., Hazen, E. L., Kerney, A., Mills, K. E., Pugh, D., Scott, J. D., Welch, H., Young-Morse, R., & Lewison, R. L. (2023). Widespread habitat loss and redistribution of marine top predators in a changing ocean. Science Advances, 9(32), Article eadi2718. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2718

Bravington, M. V., Miller, D. L., & Hedley, S. L. (2021). Variance propagation for density surface models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 26, 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00438-2

Brickman, D., Hebert, D., & Wang, Z. (2018). Mechanism for the recent ocean warming events on the Scotian Shelf of eastern Canada. Continental Shelf Research, 156, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2018.01.001

Buckland. S. T., Burt, M. L., Rexstad, E. A., Mellor, M., Williams, A. E., & Woodward, R. (2012). Aerial surveys of seabirds: The advent of digital methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49(4), 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02150.x

Certain, G., Bellier, E., Planque, B., & Bretagnolle, V. (2007). Characterising the temporal variability of the spatial distribution of animals: An application to seabirds at sea. Ecography, 30, 695-708. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.2007.0906-7590.05197.x

Chen, Y. (2015). A new methodology of spatial cross-correlation analysis. PLOS One, 10, Article e0126158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126158

Collier, M. P., Middelveld, R. P., van Bemmelen. R. S. A., Weiß, F., Irwin, C. G., & Fijn, R. C. (2022). High-definition bird and marine mammal aerial survey image collection in Borssele: First-year report (Waardenburg Ecology Report No. 22-272). Waardenburg Ecology. https://www.noordzeeloket.nl/publish/pages/206990/high-definition-bird-and-marine-mammal-aerial-survey-image-collection-in-borssele-2022.pdf

d'Entremont, K. J. N., Guzzwell, L. M., Wilhelm, S. I., Friesen, V. L., Davoren, G. K., Walsh, C. J., & Montevecchi, W. A. (2022). Northern Gannets (Morus bassanus) breeding at their southern limit struggle with prey shortages as a result of warming waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 79(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab240

Equinor. (2022). Empire Offshore Wind construction and operations plan appendix Q: Avian impact assessment for the proposed Empire Offshore Wind: Empire Wind Project (EW 1 and EW 2; Lease Area OCS-A 0512). https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/empire-wind-construction-and-operations-plan

Evans, J. S., & Murphy, M. A. (2023) spatialEco. (Version 2.0-2) [R package]. https://github.com/jeffreyevans/spatialEco

Gjerdrum, C., Fifield, D. A., Bolduc, F., Wong, S. N. P., Beaumont, M., & Mallory, M. L. (2024). A history of monitoring marine birds at sea in Eastern and Arctic Canada. Arctic Science, 10(4), 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2024-0037

Goetsch, C., Gulka, J., Friedland, K. D., Winship, A. J., Clerc, J., Gilbert, A., Goyert, H. F., Stenhouse, I. J., Williams, K. A, Willmott, J. R., Rekdahl, M. L., Rosenbaum, H. C., & Adams, E. M. (2023). Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem. Ecology and Evolution, 13(7), Article e10226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10226

Gonçalves Neto, A., Langan, J. A., & Palter, J. B. (2021). Changes in the Gulf Stream preceded rapid warming of the Northwest Atlantic Shelf. Communications Earth and Environment, 2, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00143-5

Grémillet, D., & Boulinier, T. (2009). Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: A review. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 391, 121-137. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08212

Grieve, B. D., Hare, J. A., & Saba, V. S. (2017). Projecting the effects of climate change on Calanus finmarchicus distribution within the U.S. Northeast Continental Shelf. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 6264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06524-1

Grundlehner, A., Leopold, M. F., & Kersten, A. (2025). This is EPIC: Extensive periphery for impact and control to study seabird habitat loss in and around offshore wind farms combining a peripheral control area and Bayesian statistics. Ecological Informatics, 85, 102981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102981

Gulka, J., Berlin, A., Friedland, K., Gilbert, A., Goetsch, C., Montevecchi, W., Perry, M., Stenhouse, I., Williams. K., & Adams, E. (2023). Assessing individual movement, habitat use, and behavior of non-breeding marine birds in relation to prey availability in the US Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 711, 77-99. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14316

Gutowsky, S. E., Studholme, K. R., Ronconi, R. A., Allard, K. A., Shlepr, K., Diamond, A. W., McIntyre, J., Craik, S. R., & Mallory, M.L. (2021). The influence of multiple industries on the behaviour of breeding gulls from four colonies across the eastern Gulf of Maine, Canada. Wildlife Biology, 2021(2), Article wlb.00804. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00804

Harker, A. J., Pavat, D., & Humphries, G. (2022). Digital video aerial surveys of marine birds and mammals at Solway Firth Special Protection Area (SPA): February 2021 (Natural England Commissioned Reports No. NECR439). Natural England. https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6445178893369344

Hartig, F. (2024). DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models [R package vignette]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html

Lamb, J., Gulka, J., Adams, E., Cook, A., & Williams, K. A. (2024). A synthetic analysis of post-construction displacement and attraction of marine birds at offshore wind energy installations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 108, 107611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107611

Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindstrom, J. (2011). An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: The stochastic partial differential equation approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 73(4), 423-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x

Lopez, A., Green, R., Williams, T., Lantz, E., Buster, G., & Roberts, B. (2022). Offshore wind energy technical potential for the contiguous United States [Presentation slides]. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/83650.pdf

Maine Offshore Wind Initiative (n.d.). Research Array. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from www.maineoffshorewind.org/research-array/

Major, H. L., Durham, S. E., Fana, N., Rivers, J. E., & Diamond, A. W. (2021). Contrasting phenological and demographic responses of Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) and Razorbill (Alca torda) to climate change in the Gulf of Maine. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9(1), 00033. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00033

Marsh, H., & Sinclair, D. F. (1989). Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53(4), 1017-1024. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809604

Matthiopoulos, J., Wakefield, E., Jeglinski, J. W. E., Furness, R. W., Trinder, M., Tyler, G., Mccluskie, A., Allen, S., Braithwaite, J., & Evans, T. (2022). Integrated modelling of seabird-habitat associations from multi-platform data: A review. Journal of Applied Ecology, 59(4), 909-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14114

Mills, K. E., Kemberling, A., Kerr, L. A., Lucey, S. M., McBride, R. S., Nye, J. A., Pershing, A. J., Barajas, M., & Lovas, C. S. (2024). Multispecies population-scale emergence of climate change signals in an ocean warming hotspot. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 81(2), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad208

Morley, J. W., Selden, R. L., Latour, R. J., Frölicher, T. L., Seagraves, R. J., & Pinsky, M. L. (2018). Projecting shifts in thermal habitat for 686 species on the North American continental shelf. PLOS One, 13, Article e0196127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196127

Nisbet, I. C., Veit, R. R., Auer, S. A., & White, T. P. (2013). Marine birds of the Eastern United States and the Bay of Fundy: Distribution, numbers, trends, threats, and management. Nuttall Ornithological Club.

Ocean Wind. (2023). Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm construction and operations plan for commercial lease (OCS-A 0498), Appendix H: Assessment of the potential effects of the Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm on birds and bats. https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/ocean-wind-1-construction-and-operations-plan-commercial-lease

O'Connell, A. F., Gardner, B., Gilbert, A. T., & Laurent, K. (2009). Compendium of avian occurrence information for the continental shelf waters along the Atlantic coast of the United States: Final report (Database section—Seabirds) (OCS Study BOEM 2012-076). U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

Ouled-Cheikh, J., Sanpera, C., Bécares, J., Arcos, J. M., Carrasco, J. L., & Ramírez, F. (2020). Spatiotemporal analyses of tracking data reveal fine-scale, daily cycles in seabird-fisheries interactions. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77(7-8), 2508-2517. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa098

Pershing, A. J., Alexander, M. A., Brady, D. C., Brickman, D., Curchitser, E. N., Diamond, A. W., McClenachan, L., Mills, K. E., Nichols, O. C., Pendleton, D. E., Record, N. R., Scott, J. D., Staudinger, M. D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Climate impacts on the Gulf of Maine ecosystem: A review of observed and expected changes in 2050 from rising temperatures. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9(1), Article 00076. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00076

Pershing, A. J., Alexander, M. A., Hernandez, C. M., Kerr, L. A., Le Bris, A., Mills, K. E., Nye, J. A., Record, N. R., Scannell, H. A., Scott, J. D., Sherwood, G. D., & Thomas, A. C. (2015). Slow adaptation in the face of rapid warming leads to collapse of the Gulf of Maine cod fishery. Science, 350(6262), 809-812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9819

R Core Team (2024) R (Version 4.5.0) [Computer software]. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/

Scopel, L., Diamond, A., Kress, S., & Shannon, P. (2019). Varied breeding responses of seabirds to a regime shift in prey base in the Gulf of Maine. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 626, 177-196. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13048

Scott, M. S., Humphries, G., Irwin, C., Peters-Grundy, R., Vilela, R., Southward, B., & Thompson, K. (2023). Inshore wintering waterfowl in Moray Firth Special Protection Area: 2019/20 digital aerial surveys and comparative analyses of aerial and shore-based surveys (NatureScot Research Report No. 1280). NatureScot. https://www.nature.scot/doc/naturescot-research-report-1280-inshore-wintering-waterfowl-moray-firth-special-protection-area

Seidov, D., Mishonov, A., & Parsons, R. (2021). Recent warming and decadal variability of Gulf of Maine and Slope Water. Limnology and Oceanography, 66(9), 3472-3488. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11892

Smith, O. A., & Craig, E. C. (2023). Effects of Atlantic butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus) in diets of Common Terns (Sterna hirundo): A case study of climate change effects in the Gulf of Maine. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 18(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-02440-180201

Staudinger, M. D., Mills, K. E., Stamieszkin, K., Record, N. R., Hudak, C. A., Allyn, A., Diamond, A., Friedland, K. D., Golet, W., Henderson, M. E., Hernandez, C. M., Huntington, T. G., Ji, R., Johnson, C. L., Johnson, D. S., Jordaan, A., Kocik, J., Li, Y., Liebman, M., Nichols, O. C., Pendleton, D., Richards, R. A., Robben, T., Thomas, A. C., Walsh, H. J., & Yakola, K. (2019). It's about time: A synthesis of changing phenology in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem. Fisheries Oceanography, 28(5), 532-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12429

Suca, J. J. (2021). Environmental drivers of the abundance and distribution of forage fishes on the Northeast US shelf, with a particular emphasis on northern sand lance [PhD thesis, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution]. MIT Libraries DSpace@MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/142713

Sydeman, W. J., Thompson, S. A., & Kitaysky, A. (2012). Seabirds and climate change: Roadmap for the future. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 454, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09806

Thomas, A. C., Pershing, A. J., Friedland, K. D., Nye, J. A., Mills, K. E., Alexander, M. A., Record, N. R., Weatherbee, R., & Henderson, E. M. (2017). Seasonal trends and phenology shifts in sea surface temperature on the North American northeastern continental shelf. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 5, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.240

Thorson, J. T. (2018). Three problems with the conventional delta-model for biomass sampling data, and a computationally efficient alternative. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 75(9), 1369-1382. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0266

Thorson, J. T., Pinsky, M. L., & Ward, E. J. (2016). Model‐based inference for estimating shifts in species distribution, area occupied and centre of gravity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(8), 990-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12567

Townsend, D. W., Pettigrew, N. R., Thomas, M. A., & Moore, S. (2023). Warming waters of the Gulf of Maine: The role of Shelf, Slope and Gulf Stream Water masses. Progress in Oceanography, 215, Article 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103030

Whitney, N. M., Wanamaker, A. D., Ummenhofer, C. C., Johnson, B. J., Cresswell-Clay, N., & Kreutz, K. J. (2022). Rapid 20th century warming reverses 900-year cooling in the Gulf of Maine. Communications Earth and Environment, 3, Article 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00504-8

Winship, A., Leirness, J., Coyne, M., Howell, J., Saba, V., & Christensen, J. (2023). Modeling the distributions of marine birds at sea to inform planning of energy development on the U.S. Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS Study BOEM 2023-060). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. https://doi.org/10.25923/1efv-wt21

Winship, A. J., Kinlan, B. P., White, T. P., Leirness, J. B., & Christensen, J. (2018). NCCOS assessment: Modeling at-sea density of marine birds to support Atlantic marine renewable energy planning from 1978-2016 (NCEI Accession 0176682) [Data set]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://doi.org/10.25921/8eq5-q834

Wood, S. N. (2003). Thin Plate Regression Splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 65, 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00374

Zheng, N., Cadigan, N., & Thorson, J. T. (2024). A note on numerical evaluation of conditional Akaike information for nonlinear mixed-effects models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.14185

Žydelis, R., Dorsch, M., Heinänen, S., Nehls, G., & Weiss, F. (2019). Comparison of digital video surveys with visual aerial surveys for bird monitoring at sea. Journal of Ornithology, 160, 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1622-4

Search by author or title:

Browse previous volumes: