Volume 54, No. 1
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 54, No. 1, 2026
- Volume 53, No. 2, 2025
- Volume 53, No. 1, 2025
- Volume 52, No. 2, 2024
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Assessing the impact of coordinated mink culling on bird populations on coastal islands in Norway.
Citation
Staven, F. R., & Nygård, T. (2026). Assessing the impact of coordinated mink culling on bird populations on coastal islands in Norway.
Marine Ornithology, 54(1),
33-40.
http://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.54.1.1692
Received 25 September 2025, accepted 27 October 2025
Date Published: 2026/04/15
Date Online: 2026/04/25
Key words: American Mink, predator control, seabirds, coastal Norway, biodiversity
Abstract
The introduction of the non-native American Mink Neogale vison (syn. Neovison vison), a predator of birds and their chicks and eggs, is one of many anthropogenic factors that may be driving the decline of seabird populations in areas where mink are prevalent. Previous studies have shown that ground-nesting birds utilising coastal ecosystems are especially vulnerable. In this study, we investigated changes in seabird and coastal-bound bird populations, focusing on ground-nesting species, and the potential effect from mink culling. Ten locations in the archipelago of Flatanger, a coastal municipality in central Norway, were surveyed, and bird counts from 1991, 2016, and 2023 were compared. A total of 247 mink were trapped and removed from 2015 to 2023 because of a bounty hunting program initiated by the government. The study found that the abundance of most avian species decreased from 1991 to 2016. However, from 2016 to 2023, diversity (Shannon diversity index, H') increased significantly, and a greater number of ground-nesting species were observed overall. Notably, numbers of terns, including the Common Tern Sterna hirundo and Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea, decreased dramatically from 1991 to 2016 but showed the largest increase of any species between 2016 and 2023. Terns are particularly sensitive to mink predation. Our results suggest that incentivizing local hunters to trap mink may have contributed to an increase in local faunal diversity. However, further research and targeted management strategies are required to ensure long-term conservation, as the complexity of ecological drivers make it difficult to attribute population declines solely to mink predation. Nonetheless, early indications and the significant increase in H' following nine years of mink culling suggest culling may have contributed to positive ecological changes.
References
Artsdatabanken. (2024). Artskart, mink, 1950-2023. Artsdatabanken. https://artsdatabanken.no
Banks, P. B., Nordström, M., Ahola, M., Salo, P., & Fey, K. (2008). Impacts of alien mink predation on island vertebrate communities of the Baltic Sea Archipelago: Review of a long-term experimental study. Boreal Environment Research, 13, 3-16.
Bevanger, K. (2021). Invasive alien species in Scandinavia. In T. Pullaiah & M. R. Ielmini (Eds.), Invasive alien species (pp. 1-41). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119607045.ch26
Bonesi, L., & Palazon, S. (2007). The American mink in Europe: Status, impacts, and control. Biological Conservation, 134(4), 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.006
Burness, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (1993). Direct and indirect consequences of mink presence in a common tern colony. The Condor, 95(3), 708-711. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369614
Clode, D., & Macdonald, D. W. (2002). Invasive predators and the conservation of island birds: The case of American mink Mustela vison and terns Sterna spp. in the Western Isles, Scotland. Bird Study, 49(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650209461255
Craik, J. C. A. (1995). Effects of North American mink on the breeding success of terns and smaller gulls in west Scotland. Seabird, 17, 3-10.
Craik, J.C.A. (1997). Long-term effects of North American mink Mustela vison on seabirds in western Scotland. Bird Study, 44(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659709461065
Croxall, J. P., Butchart, S. H. M., Lascelles, B., Stattersfield, A. J., Sullivan, B., Symes, A., & Taylor, P. (2012). Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: A global assessment. Bird Conservation International, 22(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270912000020
Cury, P. M., Boyd, I. L., Bonhommeau, S., Anker-Nilssen, T., Crawford, R. J., Furness, R. W., & Sydeman, W. J. (2011). Global seabird response to forage fish depletion: One-third for the birds. Science, 334(6063), 1703-1706. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212928
Dias, M. P., Martin, R., Pearmain, E. J., Burfield, I. J., Small, C., Phillips, R. A., & Croxall, J. P. (2019). Threats to seabirds: A global assessment. Biological Conservation, 237, 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.033
Follestad, A., & Lorentsen, S. H. (2011). Takseringsmanual for måker, terner, skarv, teist, ærfugl og grågås. Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning (NINA). https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/pppbasepdf/rapport/2011/716.pdf
Frederiksen, M., Daunt, F., Harris, M. P., & Wanless, S. (2008). The demographic impact of extreme events: Stochastic weather drives survival and population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(5), 1020-1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01422.x
Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., & Watson, R. (2008). A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319(5865), 948-952. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149345
Ibarra, J. T., Fasola, L., Macdonald, D. W., Rozzi, R., & Bonacic, C. (2009). Invasive American mink Mustela vison in wetlands of the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, southern Chile: What are they eating? Oryx, 43(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308099997
López, R., Clapperton, B. K., & Medina-Vogel, G. (2023). A global review of the American mink (Neovison vison) removal techniques - Patagonia as a case study for their potential application. Gayana, 87(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-65382023000100043
Nordström, M., Högmander, J., Laine, J., Nummelin, J., Laanetu, N., & Korpimäki, E. (2003). Effects of feral mink removal on seabirds, waders and passerines on small islands in the Baltic Sea. Biological Conservation, 109(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00162-3
Nordström, M., & Korpimäki, E. (2004). Effects of island isolation and feral mink removal on bird communities on small islands in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(3), 424-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00816.x
Ortiz-Burgos, S. (2016). Shannon-Weaver diversity index. In M. J. Kennish (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Estuaries (pp. 572-573). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4_233
Paleczny, M., Hammill, E., Karpouzi, V., & Pauly, D. (2015). Population trend of the world's monitored seabirds, 1950-2010. PLOS One, 10(6), e0129342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129342
RStudio Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 2024). RStudio, PBC. https://posit.co/
The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management. (2011). Scientific basis for action plan against American mink in Norway: Invasive American mink (Neogale vison). Status, ecology and control strategies (DN-utredning 6-2011). Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/dirnat/attachment/2264/dn-utredning-6-2011_nett.pdf
The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management. (2023). Naturoppsyn og kontroll. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/ansvarsomrader/tilsyn-naturoppsyn/naturoppsyn-og-kontroll/
Udø, P. O. (2005). Villminkens (Mustela vison) effekt på klekkesuksessen til sjøfugl ved Sørlandskysten [Master's thesis, Unoversity of Oslo]. DUO Research Archive. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/11724/1/masteroppgave05.pdf