Volume 50, No. 1
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Spatial effects in relation to reproductive performance of Common Murres Uria aalge at a re-established colony
Citation
McCHESNEY, G.J., YEE, J.L., PARKER, M.W., PERRY, W.M., CARTER, H.R., GOLIGHTLY, R.T. & KRESS, S.W. 2022. Spatial effects in relation to reproductive performance of Common Murres Uria aalge at a re-established colony. Marine Ornithology 50: 23 - 34
Received 04 November 2019, accepted 29 September 2021
Date Published: 2022/04/15
Date Online: 2022/02/10
Key words: Common Murre, Uria aalge, reproductive performance, spatial effects, colonial breeding, re-colonization, social attraction
Abstract
A main goal of seabird colony restoration is for the colony to become self-sustaining. To do so, elevated rates must be attained in (1) reproductive success and (2) recruitment by immigrants and birds produced at the colony. Thus, an understanding of the factors affecting reproductive success and recruitment at restoration sites is vital. We examined how spatial features at the colony level affected reproductive success of Common Murres Uria aalge (hereafter, murres) over a six-year period at Devil's Slide Rock, California, a colony re-established using social attraction techniques. Clusters of sites with similar egg-laying dates, as well as high hatching and breeding success, occurred in the densest portion of the colony, which was also the last area occupied by murres at the time of extirpation and the first area to be re-colonized. Clusters of sites with low success occurred in outlying, low-density portions of the colony. Breeding success, influenced largely by high fledging success, averaged > 60% most years. Reproductive success was greatest at breeding sites with earlier egg-laying dates, those in closest proximity to the breeding sites of other murres and the Brandt's Cormorant Urile penicillatus, and those outside Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis disturbance zones. Based on our findings, for future murre restoration projects in the California Current System, we suggest (1) placing social attraction equipment in the area(s) last utilized by murres prior to extirpation, (2) attempting to establish two dense breeding groups, (3) targeting sites already utilized regularly by nesting Brandt's Cormorants, and (4) avoiding sites or habitats prone to disturbance by larger and aggressive species such as Brown Pelicans, Bald Eagles Haliaeetus leucocephalus, or Common Ravens Corvus corax.
References
AINLEY, D.G. 1990. Farallon seabirds: Patterns at the community level. In: AINLEY, D.G. & R.J. BOEKELHEIDE (Eds.) Seabirds of the Farallon Islands: Ecology, Dynamics, and Structure of an Upwelling-system Community. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
AINLEY, D.G., NETTLESHIP, D.N. & STOREY, A.E. (2021). Common Murre (Uria aalge), version 2.0. In: BILLERMAN, S.M., RODEWALD, P.G. & KEENEY, B.K. (Eds.) Birds of the World. Ithaca, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bow.commur.02
BIRKHEAD, T. R. 1977. The effect of habitat and density on breeding success in the Common Guillemot (Uria aalge). Journal of Animal Ecology 46: 751-764.
BIRKHEAD, T.R., GREENE, E., BIGGINS, J.D. & NETTLESHIP, D.N. 1985. Breeding site characteristics and breeding success in Thick-billed Murres. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 1880-1884.
BOEKELHEIDE, R.J, AINLEY, D.G., MORRELL, S.H. & LEWIS, T.J. 1990a. Brandt's Cormorant. In: AINLEY, D.G. & BOEKELHEIDE, R.J. (Eds.) Seabirds of the Farallon Islands: Ecology, Dynamics, and Structure of an Upwelling-system Community. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
BOEKELHEIDE, R.J, AINLEY, D.G., MORRELL, S.H., HUBER, H.R. & LEWIS, T.J. 1990b. Common Murre. In: AINLEY, D.G. & BOEKELHEIDE, R.J. (Eds.) Seabirds of the Farallon Islands: Ecology, Dynamics, and Structure of an Upwelling-system Community. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
BRIGGS, K.T., TYLER, W.B., LEWIS, D.B. & DETTMAN, K.F. 1983. Seabirds of central and northern California, 1980-1983: Status, abundance and distribution. Final Report. Santa Cruz, USA: University of California, Center for Marine Studies.
BURNHAM, K.P. & ANDERSON, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Second Edition. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
CAPITOLO, P.J., CARTER, H.R., McCHESNEY, G.J. & PARKER, M.W. 2005. Common Murres prospecting within cormorant colonies in Del Norte and Humboldt counties, California, 1996 to 2004. Northwestern Naturalist 86: 144-150.
CARTER, H.R., WILSON, U.W., LOWE, R.W. ET AL. 2001. Population trends of the Common Murre (Uria aalge californica). In: MANUWAL, D.A., CARTER, H.R., ZIMMERMAN, T.S. & ORTHMEYER, D.L. (Eds.) Biology and Conservation of the Common Murre in California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Volume 1: Natural history and population trends. Washington, D.C.: US Geological Survey, Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR-2000-0012.
CARTER, H.R., LEE, V.A., PAGE, G.W. ET AL. 2003a. The 1986 Apex Houston oil spill in central California: Seabird injury assessment and litigation process. Marine Ornithology 31: 9-19.
CARTER, H.R., CAPITOLO, P.J., PARKER, M.W., GOLIGHTLY, R.T. & YEE, J. 2003b. Population impacts to Common Murres at the Drake's Bay colony complex, California. In: CARTER, H.R. & GOLIGHTLY, R.T. (Eds.) Seabird Injuries from the 1997-1998 Point Reyes Tarball Incident. Unpublished report. Arcata, USA: Humboldt State University, Department of Wildlife.
CHIVERS, L.S., LUNDY, M.G. & REID, N. 2012. Stable breeding despite variable feeding in two sympatric auk (Alcidae) species. Bird Study. 59: 67-73. doi:10.1080/00063657.2011.632618
CRAWLEY, M.J. 2007. The R Book. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons Limited.
DANCHIN, E., BOULINER, T. & MASSOT, M. 1998. Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79: 2415-2428.
GASTON, A.J. & ELLIOTT, R.D. 1996. Predation by ravens Corvus corax on Brunnich's Guillemot Uria lomvia eggs and chicks and its possible impact on breeding site selection. Ibis 138: 742-748.
GASTON, A.J. & NETTLESHIP, D.N. 1981. The Thick-billed Murres of Prince Leopold Island. Wildlife Monograph No. 6. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Wildlife Service.
GOERICKE, R., BOGRAD, S.J., GAXIOLO-CASTRO, G. ET AL. 2004. The state of the California Current 2003-2004: a rare 'normal' year. California Cooperative Fisheries Investigations Reports 45: 27-60.
HARRIS, M.P., WANLESS, S., BARTON, T.R. & ELSTON, D.A. 1997. Nest site characteristics, duration of use and breeding success in the guillemot Uria aalge. Ibis 139: 468-476.
HATCHWELL, B.J. 1991. An experimental study of the effects of timing of breeding on the reproductive success of Common Guillemots (Uria aalge). Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 721-736.
HIPFNER, J.M., MORRISON, K.W. & DARVILL, R. 2011. Peregrine Falcons enable two species of colonial seabirds to breed successfully by excluding other aerial predators. Waterbirds 34: 82-88.
HIPFNER, J.M., BLIGHT, L.K., LOWE, R.W. ET AL. 2012. Unintended consequences: how the recovery of sea eagle Haliaeetus spp. populations in the northern hemisphere is affecting seabirds. Marine Ornithology 40: 39-52.
HORTON, C.A. & SURYAN, R.M. 2012. Brown Pelicans: A new disturbance source to breeding Common Murres in Oregon? Oregon Birds 38: 84-88.
HOTHORN, T., HORNIK, K. & ZEILEIS, A. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15: 651-674.
JONES, H.P. & KRESS, S.W. 2012. A review of the world's active seabird restoration projects. Journal of Wildlife Management 76: 2-9.
KAPPES, P.J., MCCHESNEY, G.J., PARKER, M.W., CARTER, H.R., KRESS, S.W. & GOLIGHTLY, R.T. 2011. Use of time-activity budgets to measure early progress of a social attraction restoration project. Biological Conservation 144: 620-626.
KOKKO, H., HARRIS, M.P. & WANLESS, S. 2004. Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the Common Guillemot Uria aalge. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 367-376.
KRESS, S.W. 1998. Applying research for effective management: Case studies in seabird restoration. In: MARZLUFF, J.M. & SALLABANKS, R. (Eds.) Avian Conservation: Research and Management. Washington, USA: Island Press.
KRESS, S.W. & NETTLESHIP, D.N. 1988. Re-establishment of Atlantic Puffins (Fratercula artica) at a former breeding site in the Gulf of Maine. Journal of Field Ornithology 59: 161-170.
MANUWAL, D.A. & CARTER, H.R. 2001. The natural history of the Common Murre (Uria aalge californica). In: MANUWAL, D.A., CARTER, H.R., ZIMMERMAN, T.S. & ORTHMEYER, D.L. (Eds.) Biology and Conservation of the Common Murre in California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Volume 1: Natural history and population trends. Washington, USA: US Geological Survey, Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR-2000-0012.
MCCHESNEY, G.J., CARTER, H R., PARKER, M.W., TAKEKAWA, J.E. &. YEE, J.L. 1998. Population trends and subcolony use of Common Murres and Brandt's Cormorants at Point Reyes Headlands, California, 1979-1997. Unpublished report. Dixon, USA: US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Ecological Research Center; Arcata, USA: Humboldt State University, Department of Wildlife; Newark, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
MCCHESNEY, G.J, CARTER, H.R., PARKER M.W., CAPITOLO, P.J., TAKEKAWA, J.E. & YEE, J.L. 1999. Population trends and subcolony use of Common Murres and Brandt's Cormorants at the Castle/Hurricane Colony Complex, California 1979-1997. Unpublished report. Dixon, USA: US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Ecological Research Center; Arcata, USA: Humboldt State University, Department of Wildlife; Newark, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
MORANDINI, V., DUGGER, K.M., AINLEY, D. & FERRER, M. 2020. Rockhopper Penguin-Imperial Cormorant mixed colonies in the Falkland Islands: a stroke of luck for late breeders. Ecosphere 11: e03272. doi:10.1002/ecs2.3272
MURPHY, E.C. & SCHAUER, J.H. 1996. Synchrony in egg-laying and reproductive success of neighboring Common Murres, Uria aalge. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39: 245-258.
PARKER, M.W., KRESS, S.W., GOLIGHTLY, R.T. ET AL. 2007. Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds 30: 17-28.
PARRISH, J.K. 1995. Influence of group size and habitat type on reproductive success in Common Murres (Uria aalge). The Auk 112: 390-401.
PARRISH, J. & PAINE, R.T. 1996. Ecological interactions and habitat modification in nesting Common Murres. Bird Conservation International 6: 261-269.
PETERSON, W.T., EMMETT, R., GOERICKE R. ET AL. 2006. The state of the California Current, 2005-2006: warm in the north, cool in the south. California Cooperative Fisheries Investigations Reports 47: 30-74.
QUINN, J.L. & UETA, M. 2008. Protective nesting associations in birds. Ibis 150 (Suppl. 1): 146-167.
R CORE TEAM. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Available online at: www.R-project.org. Accessed on 01 July 2020.]
RAY, M.S. 1909. The passing of the Pedro Island sea-bird rookery. The Condor 11: 94-96.
SAS INSTITUTE. 2007. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.2. Cary, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
SHULTZ, M.T., PIATT, J.F., HARDING, A.M.A., KETTLE, A.B. & VAN PELT, T.I. 2009. Timing of breeding and reproductive performance in murres and kittiwakes reflect mismatched seasonal prey dynamics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393: 247-258. doi:10.3354/meps08136
SHIELDS, M. 2002. Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis). In: POOLE, A. & F. GILL (Eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 609. Philadelphia, USA: The Birds of North America, Inc.
SOWLS, A.L., DEGANGE, A.R., NELSON, J.W. & LESTER, G.S. 1980. Catalog of California Seabird Colonies. FWS/OBS 37/80. Washington, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program.
SURYAN, R.M., IRONS, D.B., BROWN, E.D., JODICE, P.G.R. & ROBY, D.D. 2006. Site-specific effects on productivity of an upper trophic-level marine predator: Bottom-up, top-down, and mismatch effects on reproduction in a colonial seabird. Progress in Oceanography 68: 303-328.
SYDEMAN, W.J. & J.O. EDDY. 1995. Repeatability in laying date and its relationship to individual quality for Common Murres. The Condor 97: 1048-1052.
TAKEKAWA, J.E., CARTER, H.R. & HARVEY, T.E. 1990. Decline of the Common Murre in central California 1980-1986. Studies in Avian Biology 14: 149-163.
THAYER, J.A., SYDEMAN, W.J., FAIRMAN, N.P. & ALLEN, S.G. 1999. Attendance and effects of disturbance on coastal Common Murre colonies at Point Reyes, California. Waterbirds 22: 130-139.
THIBAULT, J.M., MCCHESNEY, G.J., GOLIGHTLY, R.T., GOLEY, P.D. & CARTER, H.R. 2010. Decline of the Common Murre colony at Redding Rock, California, and restoration options. Unpublished report. Newark, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex; Arcata, USA: Humboldt State University, Departments of Wildlife and Biological Sciences.
VALONE, T.J. & TEMPLETON, J.J. 2002. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London B 357: 1549-1557.
WANLESS, S. & HARRIS, M.P. 1988. The importance of relative laying date on breeding success of the guillemot Uria aalge. Ornis Scandinavica 19: 205-211.